Examination Of The Ruling Of The Syar'iyah Court On Divorce Cases Lawsuit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62568/jomn.v1i1.102Keywords:
Examination, Decision of Mahkamah Syar’iyah, Contested divorce caseAbstract
When there is an indication of judicial negligence in providing legal considerations, it is highly possible to conduct an examination or investigation. The decision of the Bireuen Sharia Court regarding divorce on demand, the panel of judges pronounced talak ba’in sughrā against the plaintiff without first attempting reconciliation through the appointment of an arbitrator. Looking at the legal provisions, when a case falls under shiqāq, the judge must appoint an arbitrator. Therefore, departing from this issue, there is a need for an examination as to why the judge did not appoint an arbitrator to resolve the dispute and what legal considerations were provided by the judge. This study is designed with a qualitative pattern, utilizing a statutory approach. Data collection techniques involve documentation and interviews. The research findings prove that the panel of judges argued that it did not fall under shiqāq cases, hence the appointment of an arbitrator was not necessary. The legal considerations provided by the judge in the divorce ruling include fiqhiyah principles, legal provisions, Supreme Court jurisprudence, Quranic verse al-Rūm ayat 21, and fiqhiyah principles.
References
A. Basiq Djalil, Pengadilan Agama di Indonesia, Cet. II, Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
A. Mukti Arto, Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agama, Cet. VI, Yogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset, 2005.
Abd al-Rahman bin Abū Bakar al-Suyutī, al-Ashbah wa al-Nazāir, Bairut: Dār al-Kutb al-Ilmiah, 1983.
Abdullah, K. (2021). Cerai Gugat Akibat Suami Tidak Bertanggungjawab. Al-Fikrah, 7(1), 69-87.
Burhan Bungin, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Aktualisasi Metodologis ke Arah Varian Kontemporer, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.
Hadi Mufaat Ahmad, Fiqh Munakahat, Jakarta: Duta Grafika, 1992.
Hasan Bisri (selanjutnya disebut Bisri), Pilar-pilar Penelitian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
Hasbullah Bakry, Kumpulan Lengkap Undang-Undang Dan Peraturan Perkawinan Indonesia, Jakarta: Djambatan, 1978.
Jaenal Aripin, Kumpulan Undang-undang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Cet. I, Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
Kadir, M. A. (Ed.). (2022). Problematika Gugatan Perceraian Dalam Masyarakat Islam (Dilengkapi Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Syar’iyah dengan Pendekatan Fiqh). Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini.
Karimuddin, K., Abbas, S., Sarong, A. H., & Afrizal, A. (2021). Standardisasi Nafkah Istri: Studi Perbandingan Mazhab Maliki dan Mazhab Syafi’i. Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial, 23(1), 83-95.
Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung No 144 tahun 2007 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi di Pengadilan, pasal 2 dan 3.
Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) Undang-undang Nomor 8 tahun 1981, Pasal 156 ayat 1 dan 2.
Ratnaningtyas, E. M., Saputra, E., Suliwati, D., Nugroho, B. T. A., Aminy, M. H., Saputra, N., & Jahja, A. S. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. no. Januari. Aceh: Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini.
Roihan Rosyid, Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2007.
Ropaun Rambe, Hukum Acara Perdata Lengkap, Cet. VI, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
Safrizal, M. A., & Karimuddin, M. A. (2020). Penetapan Jatuh Talak dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Dan Fiqh Syafi’iyah. Jurnal Ilmiah al-Fikrah, 1(2).
Syobah, S. N., Nugraha, A. B., Juwita, R., Kamsiah, K., & Lawang, K. A. (2023). Keefektifan Komunikasi Interpersonal dalam Menyelesaikan Konflik Suami Istri. Jurnal Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(1), 118-129.
Titon Slamet Kurnia, Pengantar Sistem Hukum Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni, 2009.
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik, Pasal 4 ayat 1 sampai ayat 4.
Wasingatu Zakiyah, et all, Panduan Eksaminasi Publik, Jakarta: ICW, 2004.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Asnawi Abdullah, Zulfikri Toguan, Fatahillah Syahrul, Muhammad Saleh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a 